Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/36963 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 5039
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Nominal wage stickiness is an important component of recent medium-scale structural macroeconomic models, but to date there has been little microeconomic evidence supporting the assumption of sluggish nominal wage adjustment. We present evidence on the frequency of nominal wage adjustment using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) for the period 1996-1999. The SIPP provides high-frequency information on wages, employment and demographic characteristics for a large and representative sample of the US population. The main results of the analysis are as follows. 1) After correcting for measurement error, wages appear to be very sticky. In the average quarter, the probability that an individual will experience a nominal wage change is between 5 and 18 percent, depending on the samples and assumptions used. 2) The frequency of wage adjustment does not display significant seasonal patterns. 3) There is little heterogeneity in the frequency of wage adjustment across industries and occupations 4) The hazard of a nominal wage change first increases and then decreases, with a peak at 12 months. 5) The probability of a wage change is positively correlated with the unemployment rate and with the consumer price inflation rate.
Subjects: 
Wage stickiness
micro-level evidence
measurement error
JEL: 
E24
E32
J30
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
391.92 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.