Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Jenniferen_US
dc.description.abstractPerformance measures shall enhance the performance of companies by directing the attention of decision makers towards the achievement of organizational goals. Therefore, goal congruence is regarded in literature as a major factor in the quality of such measures. As reality is affected by many variables, in practice one has tried to achieve a high degree of goal congruence by incorporating an increasing number of these variables into performance measures. However, a goal congruent measure does not lead automatically to superior decisions, because decision makers' restricted cognitive abilities can counteract the intended effects. This paper addresses the interplay between goal congruence and complexity of performance measures considering cognitively-restricted decision makers. Two types of decision quality are derived which allow a differentiated view on the influence of this interplay on decision quality and learning. The simulation experiments based on this differentiation provide results which allow a critical reflection on costs and benefits of goal congruence and the assumptions regarding the goal congruence of incentive systems.en_US
dc.publisher|aUniv., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. |cFrankfurt am Mainen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking paper series // Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften Finance & accounting |x188en_US
dc.subject.keywordPerformance measurementen_US
dc.subject.keywordgoal congruenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordexperience-based learningen_US
dc.subject.keywordsimulation-based researchen_US
dc.subject.stwPerformance Measurementen_US
dc.subject.stwBetriebswirtschaftliches Zielen_US
dc.titleDo we measure what we get?en_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
455.98 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.