Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/36384 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGrimpe, Christophen
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-04-
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T13:29:28Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T13:29:28Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/36384-
dc.description.abstractSeveral reviews and impact assessment studies have concluded that the Sixth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP6) succeeded in fostering scientific excellence and attracting the 'A Team' in public science. However, these studies typically fail to contrast their findings with the variety of funding opportunities available to public science. Based on a sample of more than 1,000 scientists at universities and public research institutes in Germany, this paper finds that highly credentialed faculty typically chose other funding opportunities than FP6, for example grants from science foundations or industry. In fact, FP6 only seems to be attractive for the scientific 'B Team' that works rather application oriented. The findings further indicate that an FP6 participation substitutes for other grant programmes while the latter are complementary to each other. If this is intended to be changed other funding priorities will be required, for example smaller team sizes, less predefined research topics, a reduced administrative burden, and a higher quality of the peer review system.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aZentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) |cMannheimen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aZEW Discussion Papers |x10-031en
dc.subject.jelL13en
dc.subject.jelO31en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordResearch fundingen
dc.subject.keywordscientist productivityen
dc.subject.keywordSixth Framework Programmeen
dc.subject.stwEuropäische Forschungs- und Technologiepolitiken
dc.subject.stwWissenschaftleren
dc.subject.stwEntscheidungen
dc.subject.stwForschungen
dc.subject.stwProduktivitäten
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden
dc.titleScientific excellence and extramural research grants: Beggars can't be choosers?-
dc.type|aWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn627401198en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:zewdip:10031en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
152.54 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.