Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/34869 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 3743
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
In a recent randomized experiment we found mean returns to capital of between 5 and 6 percent per month in Sri Lankan microenterprises, much higher than market interest rates. But returns were found to be much higher among men than among women, and indeed were not different from zero for women. In this paper, we explore different explanations for the lower returns among female owners. We find no evidence that the gender gap is explained by differences in ability, risk aversion, or entrepreneurial attitudes. Nor do we find that differential access to unpaid family labor or social constraints limiting sales to local areas are important. We do find evidence that women invested the grants differently from men. A smaller share of the smaller grants remained in the female-owned enterprises, and men were more likely to spend the grant on working capital and women on equipment. We also find that the gender gap is largest when we compare male-dominated sectors to female-dominated sectors, although female returns are lower than male returns even for females working in the same industries as men. We then examine the heterogeneity of returns to determine whether any group of businesses owned by women benefit from easing capital constraints. The results suggest there is a large group of high-return male owners and smaller group of poor, high-ability, female owners who might benefit from more access to capital.
Subjects: 
Microenterprises
gender
microfinance
randomized experiment
JEL: 
O12
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
358.27 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.