Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342636 
Year of Publication: 
2026
Citation: 
[Journal:] Computational Optimization and Applications [ISSN:] 1573-2894 [Volume:] 94 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Springer US [Place:] New York [Year:] 2026 [Pages:] 1041-1084
Publisher: 
Springer US, New York
Abstract: 
Implicit variables of an optimization problem are used to model variationally challenging feasibility conditions in a tractable way while not entering the objective function. Hence, it is a standard approach to treat implicit variables as explicit ones. Recently, it has been shown in terms of a comparatively complex model problem that this approach, generally, is theoretically disadvantageous as the surrogate problem typically suffers from the presence of artificial stationary points and the need for stronger constraint qualifications. The purpose of the present paper is twofold. First, it introduces a much simpler and easier accessible model problem which can be used to recapitulate and even broaden the aforementioned findings. Indeed, we will extend the analysis to two more classes of stationary points and the associated constraint qualifications. These theoretical results are accompanied by illustrative examples from cardinality-constrained, vanishing-constrained, and bilevel optimization. Second, the present paper illustrates, in terms of cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization problems, that treating implicit variables as explicit ones may also be disadvantageous from a numerical point of view.
Subjects: 
Constraint qualifications
Implicit variables
Stationarity conditions
Variational analysis
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.