Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342381 
Year of Publication: 
2026
Citation: 
[Journal:] Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance [ISSN:] 2588-6142 [Volume:] 10 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [Place:] Mashhad, Iran [Year:] 2026 [Pages:] 79-93
Publisher: 
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: 
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of macroprudential policy in reducing commercial banks' risk exposure in Iran. In this study, an empirical model is developed using dynamic panel data techniques and the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to examine the impact of macroprudential policy on the risk-taking behavior of Iranian banks during the period 2010-2024. The analysis evaluates the potential effects of four macroprudential instruments aligned with policy objectives: the loan-to-income ratio (LTI), the loan-to-deposit ratio (LTD), the leverage ratio (LVR), and liquidity requirements (LIQ). As a result of stronger macroprudential oversight, commercial banks are significantly less likely to take on risk. In the context of financial sanctions and Iran's unique economic environment, macroprudential tools remain highly effective in mitigating banking risks. As such, LTD instruments have a time lag, whereas LVR instruments have an immediate impact on risk. Additionally, no single instrument is more effective than the composite macroprudential index at reducing risk-taking. A more secure, less vulnerable banking system in Iran is possible through macroprudential policies, as the results show.
Subjects: 
Banking Risk
Commercial Banks
Financial Stability
Macroprudential Policy
Systemic General Method of Moments
JEL: 
G11
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
723.87 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.