Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/342135 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Law and Economics [ISSN:] 1572-9990 [Volume:] 61 [Issue:] 1-2 [Publisher:] Springer US [Place:] New York [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 95-111
Publisher: 
Springer US, New York
Abstract: 
The Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 gave rise to an unprecedented number of emergency declarations across the world. Recent research shows that the transfer of substantial discretionary power to the executive branch in an emergency often gives rise to unlawful and unconstitutional political behaviour. In this paper, we explore if the large number of emergencies during the pandemic were special. We document that they were, in the sense that unlawful emergencies were substantially more likely to occur among democracies. We also show that apart from economic variables, better rule of law and more permissive constitutionalised emergency provisions contributed to a higher risk of unlawful behaviour.
Subjects: 
Covid
Unlawful states of emergency
Constitutional emergency provisions
De jure/De facto gap
Constitutional political economy
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.