Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/340692 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Government and Economics (JGE) [ISSN:] 2667-3193 [Volume:] 6 [Article No.:] 100039 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 1-25
Publisher: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Abstract: 
We examine the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical government interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19. In particular, we focus on the impact of strictness and variability in government interventions on the reproduction rate (Rt) and the number of new deaths (per million of inhabitants) in five different world regions (G7, G20, EU28, Central America and Asia). In line with existing evidence, we observe that more stringent and frequent NPIs contributed to slow down contagion. Unfortunately, no benefits in terms of mortality are found. In fact, with few exceptions, both strictness and variability in NPIs are associated with a rise in the number of new deaths. This evidence is observed to be stronger among advanced economies and over the second pandemic wave. Take together, our research findings advocate early and decisive implementation of NPIs, but gradual and staggered relaxation of NPIs when the pandemic appears to recede.
Subjects: 
COVID-19
Non-pharmaceutical interventions
Government
Reproduction rate
New deaths
JEL: 
H31
I12
I18
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.