Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33954
Authors: 
Stratton, Leslie Sundt
Wetzel, James N.
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 2448
Abstract: 
The Student Right-to-Know Act requires colleges to provide institution-specific information on graduation rates for students initially enrolling full-time in the fall term. Not all students, however, initially enroll full-time or in the fall term. We use longitudinal data on academic, degree-seeking students from the 1996/2001 Beginning Post-Secondary Survey to identify those students for whom statistics are and are not reported under the Act and to track their relative progress at two- and four-year institutions. We also examine the intra-institution correlation between reported and unreported students' progress to determine if the published statistics will at least allow relative comparisons. Our results indicate that the published progress rates are substantially higher than the progress rates for the unreported populations. Furthermore, while these rates are relatively comprehensive for and comparable across four-year institutions, they are neither for two-year institutions. Policy makers and prospective students will not make efficient decisions using such unreliable information.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
186.66 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.