Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33865
Authors: 
Babetskii, Ian
Campos, Nauro F.
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 2638
Abstract: 
Why are socially beneficial reforms not implemented? One simple answer to this question (which has received little attention in the literature) is that this may be caused by generalized uncertainty about the effectiveness of reforms. If agents are unsure about whether a proposed reform will work, it will be less likely to be adopted. Despite the numerous benefits economists assign to structural reforms, the empirical literature has thus far failed to establish a positive and significant effect of reforms on economic performance. We collect data from 43 econometric studies (for more than 300 coefficients on the effects of reform on growth) and show that approximately one third of these coefficients is positive and significant, another third is negative and significant, and the final third is not statistically significant different from zero. In trying to understand this remarkable variation, we find that the measurement of reform and controlling for institutions and initial conditions are main factors in decreasing the probability of reporting a significant and positive effect of reform on growth
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
258.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.