Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33551 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 1628
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This paper studies the effect of endogenous group formation on the outcome in two types of coordination games with multiple Pareto-ranked equilibria. Endogenous group formation means that in each period players are free to choose among two or more groups within which they want to play the coordination game. In the theoretical part we show that a simple myopic best reply dynamics under endogenous group formation leads to the payoff dominant outcome in both types of coordination games, independently of the initial strategy profile. In the experimental part we test this prediction. Our results show that the accuracy of the theoretical prediction is sensitive to the out-of-equilibrium properties of the respective coordination game. If the collective outcome is very sensitive to unilateral deviations, the coordination failure takes the same form under endogenous group formation as in the case of fixed groups. If, however, the coordination game is sufficiently robust against these unilateral deviations, coordination on the payoff dominant equilibrium is observed for the large majority of subjects under endogenous group formation. Moreover, in the former case we find the emergence of equally sized groups, while in the latter case large groups emerge. Interestingly, the respective group sizes can be interpreted as minimizing the individual's risk of encountering coordination deteriorating players.
Subjects: 
coordination games
endogenous formation
minimum effort game
median effort game
experiment
JEL: 
C72
C91
C92
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
382.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.