Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33451 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 1701
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The distribution of income within the household is found to matter for the allocation of resources towards nutrition. Rural Mexican households do not pool income, nor do they attain a Pareto-efficient allocation of resources. In contrast to what is commonly done in the literature, I do not assume that only the head of household and his wife share the decision-making. In particular, I present a new test of the unitary model in the context of extended families, which acknowledges that any household member may participate to the decision-making as long as he or she earns some income. I find that a change in the number of income earners is associated with a change in food calorie consumption controlling for the change in household size and household income. Both the number and identities of income earners matter in the extended family. In particular, when a female household member starts earning income, food consumption increases substantively. When it is a male household member who starts earning income, it decreases substantively.
Subjects: 
nutrition
intrahousehold allocation
extended families
JEL: 
I12
D13
I38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
303.92 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.