Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33426 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorDostie, Benoîten
dc.contributor.authorJayaraman, Rajshrien
dc.contributor.authorTrépanier, Mathieuen
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T09:11:44Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T09:11:44Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/33426-
dc.description.abstractUsing North American data, we revisit the question first broached by Krueger (1993) and re-examined by DiNardo and Pischke (1997) of whether there exists a real wage differential associated with computer use. Employing a mixed effects model to correct for both worker and workplace unobserved heterogeneity using matched employer-employee panel data, we find that computer users enjoy an almost 4 per cent wage premium over non-users. Failure to correct for the worker selection effect leads to a more than twofold overestimate of this premium, as does failure to correct for workplace unobserved heterogeneity.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x2080en
dc.subject.jelJ30en
dc.subject.jelJ31en
dc.subject.jelO30en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordwage determinationen
dc.subject.keywordcomputersen
dc.subject.keywordmixed modelsen
dc.subject.keywordlinked employer-employee dataen
dc.titleThe returns to computer use revisited, again-
dc.type|aWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn51965045Xen
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
231.45 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.