Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/333647 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 18208
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Prior research has found that boys often outperform girls in high-stakes math exams, raising the question of whether these gender differences under pressure stem from nature or nurture. This relative female disadvantage can influence access to selective university programs and subsequent career paths. Using administrative and survey data linked to a lottery-based school assignment system, we show that this disadvantage is reversed in single-sex schools: girls randomly assigned to SS schools devote more effort, outperform boys in high-stakes math exams, and have a higher likelihood of enrolling in university STEM degrees (excluding biology). These positive effects come at a cost to well-being in terms of higher stress and worse mental health. These effects are not driven by differences in teacher gender or school resources due to public versus private management. Our findings are consistent with theories emphasizing the social costs of norm violation: in single-sex schools, girls are freed from peer norms that may otherwise discourage overt academic ambition, allowing them to sustain higher effort in competitive and male-dominated domains.
Subjects: 
gender
random assignment
single-sex schooling
nurture
education
high-stakes exams
Korea
gender gap
natural experiment
JEL: 
I21
J16
I24
D91
J24
I28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.