Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/333640 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 18201
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Restricting purchases or establishing a minimum (floor) price for low-cost, high-strength alcoholic beverages is an increasingly popular policy used to address problem drinking and alcohol-related harm. We study the consumption and short-term health-at-birth impacts of the 2006 Alice Springs Liquor Supply Plan (LSP) which effectively doubled the minimum per-unit price of alcohol by prohibiting sales of large containers of wine. Net alcohol consumption per person dropped by 12%. Both price and consumption remained unaffected in control regions. We estimated a price elasticity of demand for the cheapest drink in the market as low as -0.2. While this change decreased the total volume of pure alcohol consumed, it did not achieve a key policy objective to improve infant health outcomes among babies most at-risk for alcohol-related harm. We discuss mechanisms and potential policy conclusions.
Subjects: 
alcohol regulation
health behaviours
birth outcomes
difference-in-difference estimation
JEL: 
I12
I14
L51
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.