Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStratton, Leslie Sundten_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Toole, Dennis M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWetzel, James N.en_US
dc.description.abstractStudies of college attrition typically assume that all attrition is permanent. We use data from the 1990/94 Beginning Postsecondary Survey to distinguish between long-term dropout and short-term stopout behavior in order to test that assumption. We find significant differences between those who stop out and those who drop out in the first year. Failure to recognize these differences biases the results of standard attrition models and hence may cause policy makers to pursue inappropriate policy initiatives or incorrectly target at-risk populations. Furthermore, the type of financial aid received is found to have a differential impact on stopout versus dropout probabilities.en_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x1634en_US
dc.subject.keywordcollege persistenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordcollege dropouten_US
dc.titleA multinomial logit model of college stopout and dropout behavioren_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
193.81 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.