Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/333205 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] International Area Studies Review [ISSN:] 2049-1123 [Volume:] 26 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies [Place:] Seoul [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 89-106
Publisher: 
Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul
Abstract: 
Contestation and participation are commonly viewed as two main constituent dimensions of electoral democracy. How exactly have these two dimensions been conceptualized and measured in the literature? Are they empirically observable and do they matter for democratic development and stability? This article answers the first of these questions and considers their implications for the second by reviewing the literature on these two dimensions. We discuss three issues that affect conclusions about dimensions of democracy and their relevance for understanding democratic development: First, conceptual ambiguities—substantive overlap between the two concepts—obscure the meanings of each of the two dimensions. Such ambiguities led to a second issue, which is a concept-measurement mismatch. The conceptual contributions were never really met with an empirical equivalent that would allow us to properly measure the two dimensions. Scholars continue to invoke theoretical understandings from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, but represent them using measures that were not explicitly concerned with measuring them, which presents the third issue of concept reification. As a result of these three issues, inferences about how democracy has developed and its relevance for democratic stability or for transitions to democratic rule is potentially obscured. Based on these issues, we provide three suggestions for future research concerning the concepts of contestation and participation.
Subjects: 
contestation
participation
concepts
measurement
inference
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.