Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/331871 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
IU Discussion Papers - Human Resources No. 9 (November 2025)
Publisher: 
IU Internationale Hochschule, Erfurt
Abstract: 
This article examines how both conscious and unconscious motives of leaders influence their expectations toward employees. While previous research has primarily focused on observable behavior and consciously articulated beliefs, this study specifically considers deeper, implicit motivational structures. The theoretical framework is Julius Kuhl's PSI theory, which distinguishes four fundamental motives. Data were collected using selected modules of the TOP 120ê assessment (MUT and OMT). The analysis of additional expert interviews reveals that conscious motives have a strong influence on the expectations leaders formulate. At the same time, unconscious motives also play a role, particularly when the strength of the unconscious motive significantly exceeds the conscious one. In addition to motives, personal experiences, social norms, and organizational structures also shape leaders' expectations. These findings highlight the importance of reflecting on one's own motives and their influence on leadership behavior. Targeted use of motive diagnostics can support self-reflection and, when combined with practical formats such as coaching or workshops, contribute to a more transparent communication of expectations
Subjects: 
Leadership
leadership research
PSI theory
motives
expectations
personality diagnostics
self-reflection
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.