Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/331526 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Working Paper No. 80/25
Publisher: 
The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki
Abstract: 
We develop a framework to assess when social programmes should prioritize expanding coverage versus improving targeting accuracy. Rather than treating universalism and targeting as a binary choice, we derive a practical rule-of-thumb based on observed eligibility rates and programme quotas to indicate when marginal welfare gains from expanding programme access may outweigh those from improved targeting. Applying the framework to Mozambique's national social pension program, we find that zero targeting effort may be optimal in over 60% of administrative areas, and reallocating existing resources using a binary RESbased rule could raise welfare by 13%. Our results support a differentiated approach to targeting: prioritize programme expansion in underserved high-poverty (rural) areas, and improve targeting effort where poverty is much lower (urban areas).
Subjects: 
social protection
cash transfers
targeting
universalism
welfare optimisation
Mozambique
JEL: 
I38
H53
D61
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-9267-639-1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.