Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33136
Authors: 
Akresh, Richard
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 1858
Abstract: 
Udry (1996) uses household survey data and finds that the allocation of resources within households is Pareto inefficient, contradicting the main assumption of most collective models of intrahousehold bargaining. He finds that among plots planted with the same crop in the same year, within a given household, those controlled by women produce lower yields than the men's plots. This paper challenges that finding. Using an alternative nationally representative dataset, I find that only households in regions geographically proximate to those studied by Udry exhibit Pareto inefficient intrahousehold allocations, while the rest of the country reveals no evidence of Pareto inefficiencies. Households in regions experiencing negative rainfall shocks are on average less likely to exhibit Pareto inefficient intrahousehold allocations, and these negative rainfall shocks are correlated with increases in labor resources allocated to the wife's plots, further confirming that in bad years, households try to avoid losses from Pareto inefficiency.
Subjects: 
intrahousehold allocation
collective household models
Pareto efficiency
Africa
JEL: 
D13
O12
J12
O15
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
259.12 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.