Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/330482 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] Essays in Economic & Business History (EEBH) [ISSN:] 2376-9459 [Volume:] 41 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 186-207
Publisher: 
Economic and Business History Society (EBHS), Rockford, MI
Abstract: 
In the early twentieth century, the mining industry was characterized by isolation, dangerous working conditions, employer power, and declining employment. However, miners also enjoyed high earnings, flexible schedules, and company housing. In this article, I explore intergenerational economic mobility for miners' sons. Using linked full-count US Census data to explore outcomes for miners' sons compared to other sons, I find that miners' sons usually do worse than manufacturing workers' sons but better than farmers' sons. Successful sons of miners grew up in urban neighborhoods that were mining-dependent, had access to education, and moved from their childhood counties. Sons of miners in the coal industry, which was shrinking, also did worse than sons of miners in the oil industry, which was expanding. This article sheds light on the effect that industry growth and geographic isolation has on intergenerational outcomes.
Subjects: 
ntergenerational Mobility
Mining
US Economic History
Labor History
JEL: 
J62
N32
N51
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.