Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/330476 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Essays in Economic & Business History (EEBH) [ISSN:] 2376-9459 [Volume:] 41 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 31-54
Verlag: 
Economic and Business History Society (EBHS), Rockford, MI
Zusammenfassung: 
Most contemporary historians have proposed a multitude of supply-side factors that arguably propelled the Great Divergence between the West and the East. A late nineteenth-century economist, George Gunton, instead proposed a demand-centric theory to explain the root cause for the divergence between countries. Gunton claimed that effectual demand arises from social wants that become the precondition for capital investment and growth in real wages. While social wants in the West and East were almost on par until the thirteenth century, the advent of free towns and cities in Europe, and particularly, England, set into motion a transformation of social wants. Meanwhile, without a similar revolution, social wants remained static in the East, particularly India, so that standards of living and consequently real wages too did not increase. This stark observation and the possible reasons for its timelessness have so far received scant attention in the contemporary debate. This article seeks to both address this inadequacy and draw attention to Gunton's overlooked contribution to the Great Divergence debate.
Schlagwörter: 
Great Divergence
George Gunton
social wants
free towns
standards of living
JEL: 
N10
N30
N33
N35
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
372.63 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.