Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/330462 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Essays in Economic & Business History (EEBH) [ISSN:] 2376-9459 [Volume:] 39 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 206-221
Verlag: 
Economic and Business History Society (EBHS), Rockford, MI
Zusammenfassung: 
The rise of the "New History of Capitalism" as a subfield of historical studies has magnified differences between economists and historians which started to grow during the 1970s. We describe what is and what is not new about the New History of Capitalism and explain how the different methodologies of economists and historians often cause confusion about their fields' respective advantages. We also emphasize that these different methodologies allow ample room for collaboration between the disciplines.
Schlagwörter: 
Economic History
Capitalism
Slavery
Cliometrics
Karl Marx
Karl Polanyi
Methodology
JEL: 
B2
B3
B4
N11
N12
N30
N80
O43
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
289.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.