Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/329793 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Environmental Policy and Governance [ISSN:] 1756-9338 [Volume:] 35 [Issue:] 5 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 852-867
Publisher: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Abstract: 
Research has shown that effective flood risk management is closely connected to land use governance, i.e., the land use system involving diverse, relevant stakeholders (e.g., landowners, public authorities, disaster management organisations) and their formal and informal land development practices. Our research scrutinises the often‐observed enforcement gaps emerging when unauthorised encroachment in flood‐prone areas occurs despite existing formal regulations on building activities. The study identifies factors that help explain these enforcement gaps in flood risk‐sensitive land use governance by applying an institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework and a property rights perspective. Our empirical research focuses on Accra, Ghana, which has a long history of both regular and extreme flood events and is experiencing significant growth and high in‐migration rates, leading to increased demand for land. This, paired with land litigation and limited security of tenure, has led to unplanned settlements and encroachments of flood‐prone areas, thus heightening the local population's vulnerability—conditions typical of many similar cases in Sub‐Saharan Africa. The research builds on analysing policy documents and interviews with diverse stakeholders related to flood risk management and land use governance in Accra. Applying qualitative content analysis, we identified explanatory factors in connection with the enforcement gaps, which include overlapping property rights, outpaced planning efforts, land conflicts, legal loopholes, authority mismatch, information gaps, political influence and selective enforcement, and socio‐economic pressures.
Subjects: 
Accra
flood
Ghana
governance
institutional analysis
land use
risk
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.