Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/329788 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology [ISSN:] 2044-8325 [Volume:] 98 [Issue:] 3 [Article No.:] e70037 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2025
Publisher: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Abstract: 
Employees' inclusion at work often constitutes a key leadership objective. Indeed, inclusive leadership has garnered considerable attention from research and practice, with differing interpretations persisting in the debate. An influential stream of research claims to ground its understanding of inclusive leadership in optimal distinctiveness theory (ODT), which states that people strive to fulfil two countervailing needs (i.e., assimilation and differentiation). Closer examination, however, reveals inaccuracies in applying ODT to inclusive leadership, leading to an incomplete set of proposed inclusive leader behaviours. To address these issues, we critically examine inclusive leadership's definition and theoretical foundation and propose a multi‐level framework informed by the extended version of ODT (EODT). More specifically, we detail how three complementary sets of inclusive leader behaviours can foster an employee's integrated sense of inclusion by addressing the employee's needs for assimilation and differentiation at three levels of self (i.e., individual, relational, and collective). We argue that before engaging in these behaviours, a leader must reflect on their employee's, their own, and other team members' minority/majority status to effectively adapt their actions. We discuss future research implications of this multi‐level perspective on an employee's self for broader team/social justice considerations and end with practical implications.
Subjects: 
countervailing needs
diversity management
extended optimal distinctiveness theory
inclusion
inclusive leadership
inequality
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.