Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32569
Autoren: 
Binder, Martin
Datum: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2009,099
Zusammenfassung: 
The concept of utility is often used in ambiguous ways in economics, from having substantive psychological connotations to being a formal placeholder representing a person's preferences. In the accounts of the early utilitarians, it was a multidimensional measure that has been condensed during the marginalist revolution into the unidimensional measure we know today. But can we compare different pleasures? This paper assesses the evidence from psychology and neurosciences on how to best conceive of utility. It turns out that empirical evidence does not favor a view of multidimensional utility. This does not eliminate the possibility to make a normative argument supporting a multidimensional notion of utility.
Schlagwörter: 
utility
pleasures
neuroeconomics
multidimensionality of utility
JEL: 
D87
B41
B12
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
414.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.