Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324164 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Internet Policy Review [ISSN:] 2197-6775 [Volume:] 14 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 1-30
Verlag: 
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
As governments across the world increasingly undergo digitalisation processes, ensuring cybersecurity of these provisions cannot be 100% guaranteed. How, then, can governments best respond to a cybersecurity crisis in order to bolster cybersecurity in the future? Even Estonia, one of the earliest and most pervasive examples of e-governance globally, has not been without cybersecurity crises. Using four key Estonian examples, this paper examines the components of government decision-making in the aftermath of cybersecurity crises, which aim to bolster future cybersecurity. Three key approaches emerged from the crises examined: 1) decision-making is derived from prior knowledge and experience; 2) communications around cybersecurity crises is clear, coordinated, and transparent; and 3) innovation and planning should take place in times of non-crisis, as crises often expedite decision-making. Ultimately, this paper offers insight into how governments can make decisions following cybersecurity crises, in contexts beyond Estonia, as they undergo digitalisation processes and increasingly face cyberattacks.
Schlagwörter: 
Cybersecurity governance
E-governance
Estonia
Crisis management
Cybersecurity management
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
368.5 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.