Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324104 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Citation: 
[Journal:] PSL Quarterly Review [ISSN:] 2037-3643 [Volume:] 77 [Issue:] 309 [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 123-126
Publisher: 
Associazione Economia civile, Rome
Abstract: 
This special issue of PSL Quarterly Review is devoted to the Solow-Pasinetti debate on productivity and technological progress. Florencia Sember guides the reader through the main aspects of the debate, calling attention to those precursor features of a bifurcation that would later distinguish two competing approaches to growth theory. Ariel Wirkierman delves deep into the topic of productivity definition and measurement from a Classical perspective, as opposed to a more traditional standpoint. Gabriel Brondino, Miguel Casau Guirao and Facund Fora Alcalde put forward a method for computing total labour productivity in an open economy, following Pasinetti's hint to measure labour embodied in imports as the domestic labour necessary to produce the corresponding exports. Finally, Hernan Alejandro Roitbarg, Francisco Leiva and Joaquin Lucero employ a subsystem approach to examine the rise and fall of productivity in Argentina over the period 2004-2019.
Subjects: 
input-output analysis
productivity measurement
Solow-Pasinetti debate
technical change
JEL: 
O4
C67
B51
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.