Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324100 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Citation: 
[Journal:] PSL Quarterly Review [ISSN:] 2037-3643 [Volume:] 77 [Issue:] 308 [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 23-57
Publisher: 
Associazione Economia civile, Rome
Abstract: 
This paper examines the validity of the endogenous money supply hypothesis in Türkiye from 2008 to 2020. The endogenous money hypothesis underlines the fact that a demand for bank credit leads to the creation of credit and deposit. Deposits are created once credit application is approved by banks. Therefore, the money supply is endogenously determined by bank loans. However, there exist horizontalist, structuralist, and circuitist views, each proposing different causalities between monetary aggregates and the relationship between money and income. In this article, we put forth ten hypotheses to test the validity of the endogenous money hypothesis and three main perspectives over the period 2008-2020 in Türkiye. We aim to discern which of the three main views aligns best with the sample. Our findings provide new evidence on the validity of the endogenous money hypothesis in Türkiye from 2008 to 2020. Besides, the circuit theory of money fits precisely in the short run but partially in the long run. The findings also support the structuralist view partially according to the long-run results.
Subjects: 
Endogenous money
Granger Causality
VAR
JEL: 
E02
E12
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.