Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324065 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] PSL Quarterly Review [ISSN:] 2037-3643 [Volume:] 75 [Issue:] 301 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 103-117
Publisher: 
Associazione Economia civile, Rome
Abstract: 
Under the impetus of Edward Lazear, personnel economics has established itself as a particularly dynamic area of mainstream labour economics. It aspires to provide the best solutions to the practical problems that human resource managers encounter. The following paper aims to do the following: summarize the criticisms of personnel economics made from the perspective of heterodox economics, add a new criticism, and show how these criticisms, taken together, lead us to conclude that modes of labour management are legitimate subjects of debate, contrary to Lazear's beliefs.
Subjects: 
labour economics
personnel economics
heterodox economics
imperialism
discussion of HRM decisions
JEL: 
B52
D21
J01
M12
M54
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.