Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324065 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] PSL Quarterly Review [ISSN:] 2037-3643 [Volume:] 75 [Issue:] 301 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 103-117
Verlag: 
Associazione Economia civile, Rome
Zusammenfassung: 
Under the impetus of Edward Lazear, personnel economics has established itself as a particularly dynamic area of mainstream labour economics. It aspires to provide the best solutions to the practical problems that human resource managers encounter. The following paper aims to do the following: summarize the criticisms of personnel economics made from the perspective of heterodox economics, add a new criticism, and show how these criticisms, taken together, lead us to conclude that modes of labour management are legitimate subjects of debate, contrary to Lazear's beliefs.
Schlagwörter: 
labour economics
personnel economics
heterodox economics
imperialism
discussion of HRM decisions
JEL: 
B52
D21
J01
M12
M54
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
401.59 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.