Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323974 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Citation: 
[Journal:] Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly [ISSN:] 1552-7395 [Volume:] 41 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Sage [Place:] Thousand Oaks, CA [Year:] 2012 [Pages:] 213-231
Publisher: 
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Abstract: 
Rating assessments of microfinance institutions (MFIs) are claimed to measure a combination of creditworthiness, trustworthiness, and excellence in microfinance. Using a global data set covering reports from 304 microfinance institutions, this study suggests that these ratings are mainly driven by size, profitability, and risk. The overall results suggest that microfinance ratings convey information similar to that communicated by traditional credit ratings. All results are remarkably consistent across rating agencies. The determinants of the rating grades are found to be the same in all subsamples.
Published Version’s DOI: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.