Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323618 
Year of Publication: 
1992
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Economic Studies [ISSN:] 1758-7387 [Volume:] 19 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Emerald [Place:] Bingley [Year:] 1992 [Pages:] 26-37
Publisher: 
Emerald, Bingley
Abstract: 
Population ageing has been seen as creating economic problems often described as a worsening intergenerational conflict for resources. A rising dependency ratio is said to increase the 'burden' on the working population by forcing sacrifices in their consumption. Such apparently intuitive ideas are based on the assumption of a binding aggregate resource constraint, as would occur if resources were fully utilised. From a post-Keynesian perspective, however, unemployment and excess capacity are normal to the functioning of capitalist economies, and resources are not in general fully utilised. This paper argues that the Keynesian process of national income determination precludes any immediate relationship between population ageing and the 'burden' imposed on income recipients. Below full employment, a rising dependency ratio is not guaranteed to reduce the expenditure share of income recipients or raise their tax rates. An exclusive emphasis on intergenerational conflict can give a misleading impression of the consequences of population ageing.
Subjects: 
population ageing
dependency ratio
intergenerational conflict
taxation
Keynesian economics
JEL: 
D64
E12
E24
J11
J14
Published Version’s DOI: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.