Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323462 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Business Economics [ISSN:] 1861-8928 [Volume:] 95 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Springer Berlin Heidelberg [Place:] Berlin/Heidelberg [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 385-426
Publisher: 
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin/Heidelberg
Abstract: 
Abstract In contrast to shareholders of limited-liability firms, the owners of sole proprietorships and partnerships are fully liable for their firm’s liabilities. We expect owners’ full liability to mitigate agency problems of debt and to lower creditors’ demand for financial debt covenants and accounting conservatism. Using a European sample of private firms, we find robust evidence that full-liability firms exhibit about 20–25% less timely loss recognition than limited-liability firms, confirming previous findings for German firms. In addition, we find that full-liability firms exhibit significantly more timely loss recognition in countries with high book-tax conformity, while limited-liability firms do not. Furthermore, we find some, but not robust, evidence that the strictness of the bankruptcy code and timely loss recognition are partial substitutes. Our analyses contribute to prior literature by analyzing how owner liability is related to conditional conservatism and how the characteristics of the institutional framework are related to this association.
Subjects: 
Owner liability
Private firms
Cross-country study
Conditional conservatism
Book-tax conformity
Bankruptcy law
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Additional Information: 
M41;G32;G35;K34
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.