Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322695 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2006
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Papers Series No. 06-04
Verlag: 
Utrecht University, Utrecht School of Economics, Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht
Zusammenfassung: 
This article contains a clinical study of Bekaert NV, the biggest insider trading case inBelgium. Up to now, no economic analysis of this case was ever conducted. It showed thatBelgian courts currently seem to lack knowledge of the functioning of financial markets toassess an insider trading case. Therefore their decisions give little guidance to futurelitigants. Using a law and economics framework, this case study is clarifying in severalaspects compared to a traditional legal analysis. The analysis focuses on two aspects of aninsider trading case. First, the price-sensitive character of the information is examined.Second, the standard of proof was examined.
Schlagwörter: 
insider trading
regulation
criminal prosecution
standard of proof
law & economics
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
584.19 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.