Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32243
Authors: 
Morell, Alexander
Glöckner, Andreas
Towfigh, Emanuel Vahid
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2009,23
Abstract: 
We investigate whether and how targeted rebates impede rational switching of consumers from an incumbent to an outside option (e.g., market entrant). In a real trading problem, participants repeatedly buy tokens and can enter a target rebate scheme. Buying in a rebate scheme considerably reduces the likelihood that they switch to a higher-payoff outside option later. We conclude that targeted rebates might have an underestimated potential to foreclose consumer markets. The stickiness effect increases with the increasing number of previous buying in the rebate scheme, but not with the size of the rebate. Prospect Theory can partially account for these effects.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
994.82 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.