Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322263 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] East Asian Economic Review (EAER) [ISSN:] 2508-1667 [Volume:] 29 [Issue:] 2 [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 139-199
Verlag: 
Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), Sejong-si
Zusammenfassung: 
This study examines two key challenges in services trade research: the reliability of trade data and the measurement of non-tariff barriers, particularly the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI). Using firm-level panel data from Türkiye with fixed effects, we show that international data limitations significantly affect empirical results and that the explanatory power of the gravity model declines with more detailed microdata. We also find that the STRI's link to trade flows is weaker and more sector-specific than assumed, questioning its methodological adequacy. Additionally, ad valorem equivalent (AVE) rates are estimated, revealing moderate barriers for Türkiye's exports but much higher protection in imports, notably in technical services and transport. The findings highlight the need for sector-specific liberalization and call for next-generation STRI indices that are dynamic, firm-responsive, and modular by regulatory dimension. We advocate for cautious interpretation of STRI-based estimates and encourage the use of microdata across countries to improve services trade analysis and policy design.
Schlagwörter: 
Trade in Services
Gravity Model
the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI)
Non-Tariff Barriers
Ad Valorem Equivalents (AVEs)
JEL: 
F13
F14
C23
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.66 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.