Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31974 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOhr, Renateen
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-18-
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T11:53:56Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-14T11:53:56Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/31974-
dc.description.abstractAgainst the background of the euro-sceptic view many German economists expressed during the 1990ies and the traditional as well as modern debate on the optimum currency area the outcomes of the first ten years of the European Monetary Union are analysed. It is checked to what extent the concerns raised by Maastricht critics have been justified, or rather, to what extent the feared risks have not (or have not yet) materialised. It is shown that some of the alarming risks of the European Monetary Union that had been predicted in the 1990ies have emerged in the meantime even though they have not yet essentially affected the euro's stability. But it remains to be seen whether, or rather how, the euro within the framework of a non-optimal currency area will overcome the challenges of the global financial and economic crisis without a loss of stability.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aGeorg-August-Universität Göttingen, Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar |cGöttingenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiskussionsbeiträge |x141en
dc.subject.jelE5en
dc.subject.jelF3en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordEuroen
dc.subject.keywordEuropean Monetary Unionen
dc.subject.keywordMaastricht Treatyen
dc.subject.keywordOptimum Currency Areaen
dc.titleEuropean Monetary Union at ten: Had the German Maastricht critics been wrong?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn607296925en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
198.87 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.