Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/317807 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] EconPol Forum [ISSN:] 2752-1184 [Volume:] 26 [Issue:] 2 [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 26-28
Verlag: 
CESifo GmbH, Munich
Zusammenfassung: 
Investing in climate adaptation will be much more cost-effective than paying for emergency management and recovery after climate-related disasters. There is no simple "business case" for specific adaptation initiatives; governments need to take a very long-term perspective on capital spending. Some locations and population groups - often the least powerful members of society - are much more vulnerable to climate risks than others. Governments need to generate societal consensus on how to prioritize adaptation spending and protect vulnerable groups. Governments and private actors need to delineate their respective adaptation responsibilities.
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
147.35 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.