Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31678
Authors: 
Craig, Lyn
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
Working papers // The Levy Economics Institute 439
Abstract: 
Parents who undertake paid work are obliged to spend time away from their children, and to use nonparental childcare. This has given rise to concern that children are missing out on parental attention. However, time-use studies have consistently shown that parents who are in paid employment do not reduce their parental childcare time on an hour-for-hour basis. Since there are only 24 hours in the day, how do parents continue to be engaged in direct care of their own children while also committing significant time to labor market activities? Using data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics Time Use Survey 1997 (4,059 randomly selected households) to compare the time allocation of employed fathers, employed mothers, and mothers who are not in the labor force, this paper investigates how this phenomenon arises. The strategies available are reducing the time devoted to other activities (principally housework, sleep, leisure, bathing, dressing, grooming, eating), and rescheduling activities (from weekends to weekdays, or changing the time of day at which particular activities are undertaken). The paper investigates whether parents use nonparental care to reschedule as well as to replace their own care.
Subjects: 
time use
childcare
nonparental care
work-family balance
JEL: 
D13
J16
J13
J20
J22
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
435.45 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.