Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31651 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 567
Publisher: 
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY
Abstract: 
Many heterodox strands of thought share both a concern with the study of different phases or growth regimes in the history of capitalism and the use of formal short-run models as an analytical tool. This text suggests that: (1) this strategy is potentially misleading; (2) that the stock-flow consistent (SFC) approach, while providing a general framework that may facilitate the dialogue among those currents, is particularly well suited to all those who think that macroeconomic models may illuminate historical quests; and (3) this approach's main intuitions may be conveyed through the benchmark” Post Keynesian SFC model presented by Dos Santos and Zezza (2008), dispensing with the complex computer simulations that are normally employed by SFC authors.
Subjects: 
Stock-flow consistency
long-run analyses
post Keynesian macroeconomics
neo-Kaleckian macroeconomics
régulation school
financialization
JEL: 
B50
E12
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
571.01 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.