Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316397 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 225
Verlag: 
Institute for Replication (I4R), s.l.
Zusammenfassung: 
Doctoral dissertations provide evidence about research practices in early career-stage research. We examine reporting bias by manually collecting over 94,000 test statistics from a random sample of German dissertations and their follow-up papers worldwide. We observe selective reporting, as only a fraction of the tests in the dissertations is reported in follow-up papers. Unexpectedly, we find no increase in reporting bias in follow-up papers compared to dissertations nor, generally, reporting bias in dissertations or papers. Self-selection into higher-impact journals based on statistical significance may reconcile our finding of selective yet "unbiased" reporting with prior evidence suggesting pervasive reporting bias.
Schlagwörter: 
research transparency
reporting bias
higher education
young researchers
JEL: 
A14
A23
C12
I23
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.32 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.