Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315866 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law [ISSN:] 2195-0237 [Volume:] 55 [Issue:] 5 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Berlin, Heidelberg [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 762-773
Verlag: 
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Repair, refill and recycle (in the following: repair) of physical goods is a necessity and a convenience – mending is better than ending, at least for the consumer. Where the goods to be repaired are patented, the question arises whether such act of repair infringes the patent, and under what conditions. There are different approaches by national courts on this matter, and it will eventually be the task – and the chance – of the Unified Patent Court to find its own solution to this issue. The author in this regard proposes a three-step test.
Schlagwörter: 
Right to repair
Patent infringement
Exhaustion
Unified Patent Court
Physical and intellectual property
Implied licence
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.