Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315853 
Year of Publication: 
2025
Citation: 
[Journal:] Research Policy [ISSN:] 1873-7625 [Volume:] 54 [Issue:] 3 [Article No.:] 105170 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2025 [Pages:] 1-17
Publisher: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Abstract: 
Higher education institutions have implemented various affirmative action policies aimed at increasing the representation of female professors, including measures to reduce gender bias in professorship appointments. This raises the question of whether gender bias still exists. Research on gender bias in assistant professor appointments remains sparse. We therefore examine whether gender bias in assistant professor recruitment exists and differs across disciplines (looking at mathematics/physics, economics/sociology/political science, and German studies). Our analysis is based on a factorial survey experiment with 1857 professors from German universities in 2020. We draw on Crandall and Eshleman's (2003) justification-suppression model to argue that gender policies can help suppress the expression of prejudices (negative stereotypes) against female applicants. Our results show that in all disciplines studied, female applicants receive higher ratings than male applicants, both for perceived qualification for an assistant professorship and for being invited for an interview. The female advantage is more pronounced in mathematics/physics when applicants are perceived to be equally qualified, suggesting a greater normative pressure to comply with gender-based preferential selection. In mathematics/physics, however, we also find a smaller premium for having received a research grant among female applicants. Overall, the observed female advantage is rather small in all disciplines studied.
Subjects: 
Gender bias
Assistant professorships
Disciplinary comparison
Prejudice expression model
German academia
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Data set: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.