Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWray, L. Randallen_US
dc.description.abstractMinsky's classification of fragility according to hedge, speculative, and Ponzi positions is well-known. He wrote about fragile positions of individual firms and of the economy as a whole, with the economy transitioning naturally from a robust financial structure (dominated by hedge units) to a fragile structure (dominated by speculative units). In most of Minsky's writing, he introduced government through its impact on the private sector with its spending and balance sheet operations as stabilizing forces (although he insisted that stability is ultimately destabilizing). On a few occasions he also analyzed the government's own balance sheet position. More rarely, Minsky extended his analysis to the open economy, examining the fragility of external debt positions. In these works, he analyzed the United States as the world's bank and discussed the impact of various U.S. balance sheet positions on the rest of the world. This paper will carefully examine Minsky's position on these topics, and will offer an extension of Minsky's work. It will also examine the sustainability of the current twin U.S. deficits.en_US
dc.publisher|aLevy Economics Institute of Bard College |cAnnandale-on-Hudson, NYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking papers // The Levy Economics Institute |x450en_US
dc.subject.keywordHyman Minskyen_US
dc.subject.keywordfinancial fragilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordfinancial instability hypothesisen_US
dc.subject.keywordcurrent account deficiten_US
dc.subject.keywordbudget deficiten_US
dc.titleExtending Minsky's classifications of fragility to government and the open economyen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
180.42 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.