Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/309390 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Finance and Society [ISSN:] 2059-5999 [Volume:] 6 [Issue:] 2 [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 148-156
Publisher: 
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Abstract: 
In this rejoinder, I discuss three fundamental "deadlocks" raised by contributors to this forum. These relate to the status of historical discourse, financial market logics, and above all the figure of the 'strange loop', which I put forward as a means of reorienting historical thought. I also offer some preliminary remarks on why History in Financial Times departs from conventional forms of historicism in political economy, as well as a further set of reflections on the contemporaneity of the book's argumentation.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
234.23 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.