Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/308397 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 11501
Verlag: 
CESifo GmbH, Munich
Zusammenfassung: 
What is an effective signal in crowd funding? We asked this question to 83 expert researchers who have published the top-notch articles in this field. They stated that, in theory, strong signals include past crowdfunding success, business experience, patent ownership, and the equity share offered. Examining 145 articles published in leading business and economics journals, we find that the empirical evidence from a meta-analysis does not accord with this perception among expert researchers. Signals that expert researchers consider to be theoretically less strong are more often statistically significant predictors of crowdfunding success and have neither larger nor smaller standardized effect sizes than strong signals. A meta-regression suggests that domain-specific signals play the most important role in crowdfunding. The findings of our literature review provide important insights for investors, platform managers, and the academic review process.
Schlagwörter: 
signaling
crowdfunding
crowdinvesting
peer-to-peer lending
crowdlending
meta-study
JEL: 
G21
D82
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.