Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/307962 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 194
Verlag: 
Institute for Replication (I4R), s.l.
Zusammenfassung: 
In their comment, Delpeyrou and Bertoli (2024) make several critiques of our paper (Depetris-Chauvin et al., 2020). In this reply, we show that: (i) Their purported "errors" in data construction are in the vast majority of cases simply the result of different (and, we argue, superior) choices in implementing our identification strategy; (ii) Our specification choices regarding fixed effects are not only justified but are the correct ones for a proper apples-to-apples comparison; and most crucially, (iii) Our key results are essentially robust to their own proposed modifications. Far from overturning our findings, their critique further underscores their robustness.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.07 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.