Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Schmidheiny, Kurt
Brülhart, Marius
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 2726
It is well understood that the two most popular empirical models of location choice - conditional logit and Poisson - return identical coefficient estimates when the regressors are not individual specific. We show that these two models differ starkly in terms of their implied predictions. The conditional logit model represents a zero-sum world, in which one region's gain is the other regions' loss. In contrast, the Poisson model implies a positive-sum economy, in which one region's gain is no other region's loss. We also show that all intermediate cases can be represented as a nested logit model with a single outside option. The nested logit turns out to be a linear combination of the conditional logit and Poisson models. Conditional logit and Poisson elasticities mark the polar cases and can therefore serve as boundary values in applied research.
firm location
residential choice
conditional logit
nested logit
Poisson count model
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
295.17 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.