Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/306525 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
AWI Discussion Paper Series No. 755
Verlag: 
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Many industrialized countries have recognized the need to mitigate energy cost increases faced by low-income households by fostering the adoption of energy-efficient technologies. How to meet this need is an open question, but "behavioral insights" are likely components of future policy designs. Applying well-established behavioral insights to low-income households raises questions of transportability as they are typically underrepresented in the existing evidence base. We illustrate this problem by conducting a randomized field experiment on scalable, low-cost design elements to improve program take-up in one of the world's largest energy efficiency assistance programs. Observing investment decisions of over 1,800 low-income households in Germany's "Refrigerator Replacement Program", we find that the transportability problem is real and consequential: First, the most effective policy design would not have been chosen based on existing behavioral insights. Second, design elements favored by these insights either prove ineffective or even backfire, violating "do no harm" principles of policy advice. Systematic testing remains crucial for addressing the transportability problem, particularly for policies targeting vulnerable groups.
Schlagwörter: 
Transportability
low-income households
field experiment
randomized controlled trial
governmental welfare programs
energy efficiency
technology adoption
JEL: 
C93
D91
Q49
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
3.15 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.